bargain

usually when i say something the others take it as the beginning of the bargain

but usually when i say something i say it

so i don't say anything

and let the world come to me

sence

You get a sense that the greeks receive this as another european "package" (subsidies)

they will eat it fill their stomachs
and then complain and look for more


I hope i'm right so that we get done with this procrastination this protracted misery

Bridget Fonda and the other

well Bridget Fonda seems to have married a gay guy
or such a weak person who by all other accounts could be considered gay

I don't know what happens there
but I'm holding my fingers crossed

a bunch of hoooey

George Berkeley and hobes and all that is a bunch of hoooey

a bunch of ecclesiastical parodies

of course we have the other side:

Kant is hogwash

Hegel: ceramic on cement

Nietzsche, the clown man of philosophy

that's why Americans like him

petraeus

general petraeus was made of petra (i.e. stone)
a flimsy man to look at
what star of the battlefield
he never set foot on the battlefield
a man of the office

i don't know the implications and care less to know
he was married?
you are not allowed to have an affair a relationship while in the army
with another officer or member of the press
it breaks "the morale" "of the troops"

general petraeus was made of petra (i.e. stone)
"panzies" some people would call it

Laura Silverman

that's a hardish woman
that's a manly woman
the average guy won't find her sexual
and she won't take in much sex either

she's one of my favourites
when she beams those eyes

but not when i wan a sexxy woman

why am i writing this?
because i can't take it any more staring at those pictures

and all hell will break out
if she declares herself a lesbian one day

Vapid descriptions

people

we have the B-literature and the B-everything
although sometime i laugh at them or hold my nose at them
or just pass them by

these belong to people

those are existing people!
those are people that exist!


we see movies everyday
with real people
and unscripted (or scripted)

then we turn to the tv
and we see other people\
real copies of the previous ones

then we move to the next level
of seeing the tv

and the people are gone

then we take a deep rod and we strike it deep into ourselves

and then we hit the human

why some people want to publish their poetry?
that's the first sign of ego
the self? i don't think that abides with me the self is the thing itself and in itself
when it looks at itself them becomes ego

why if i want to say something i say it
if i want to sing something i sing it out

then we move to writing and we move away frorm first principle

we record the history

because it becomes too much to carry into our brains

i don't know there seem to be a force an invisible force that forces us in that directiouin

and i did that too

of course the usual excuse we throw it to a friend and ask them to validate their position for us

everyone does that

the society is so complex that you can't just go out and to that thing directly

you can't just go out and shout it , or sing it

the most you could suffer is the annoyed neighbor
(is that what people do when they get drunk and shout or sing in the middle of the night?)

and now alla of a sudden you have the blog

you get direct access again

of course you could do that before you could stick a sign on the post - but who could read it?

you could put a whole literature in it nobody would stay and read it

you could stick only epigrams things that could be read in once and go

now you have the luxury to post your whole literature on the net and nobody will read it again
at least you have the illusion that someone will read it




things have to move constantly things that is living things people

to retain their independence to avoid being captured

all that is dissimulation

the real self is captured in one shot

and the people start to open up gradually or slightly or awkwardly
and the ones is on to defend it to withdraw to cover


and that's what you get in the most middle-size towns in america the blockish mall and the nature next to it

and that's the best regardless if the people have their orientation turned towards the block (according to the in-out-in pattern we were in nature now we go to the blockish world will we ever return to nature the place of comfort to the in?

in the deepest sense we are in non-existence then you were in existence will we ever go to unexistence again? but we'll leave that unexplored because
it hinges on the question of were you non-existent? it has no meaning in our current mode of existence


that's what happened with the experiment in the 70s but it was artificial or they did it in their own terms they achieved liberations

but alas it was not be sustained

and that's Engles's mistake the wish for a return to a previous stage of development while the world has moved onto another
to a newer to a next? level of development

it is obvious that people execute what was in their present state of development no matter what the exoteric forms and structure it took

and as always the same basic elements of human and animal nature

you won't tell me that the power started just with the development of property

do not the lions overpower the zebra and the gazella

of course they will be excused for that was in their current level of understanding (could they? didn't just the aggressive guys lead

the so called 'revolution'? they did what they had to do and excused even unconsciously it on the teaching)

now return to a more normal state

and everything is becoming so transparent that i think we might be in for another change the current system being so transparent it
means it lost its hidennes thus it has to change, or die

it seems we cannot return back to being animals again except n rare cases psychotic cases)


it's difficult now with the internet for people who want to be seen to get that direct feeling

that gush of energy from visual contact (that's the ether there too yes indeed)

when you are engaged as in emails or in chat it seem it works by proxy: a certain amount of intelligence/sense is accumulated
into your brain and the response becomes analogous

it is only possible that you get a feeling of the person by aura as in real life

it's quiestionable that energy travels in those distances and what energy is that

but you do get a feeling

or how do you know what it's gonna be before you open that envelope? (many women report that)
is it some preplanted sense in the previous letter or correspondence that now comes materialized?
or is it some energy that is carried through with the letter or other item of correspondence?

if you move to Mars and you get a letter from someone you don't know for the first time will you get that feeling of something positive or negative?

if your senses are so sharpened because of the isolation maybe so

it's like you walk in the forest in the night your senses are all intense you will know if there is something there

is that because you interpret signs perceptually (hear deepest see sense on your skin something)

or it is mosthing les that hits your skin notable

if you close your eyes you will still have that perception if you close your ears?

then you have the dogs who sense things miles away

and the camillieri the camel travelers of the desert they sense things detect the slightest sound (which means movement which means change in position) in immense distances and that's not by dint of the because the camels sense it
in their tents



now with internet you have to rely on likes and dislikes on video response or in direct text response

and wasn't that similar in the age of the telephony?

and you go around and see what people think

not that you'll get the right answer but a sense

if that's what the people think
that's what it is

and then you have to live with that choke it up and occasionally burst into tears

for some people the language is used to cover and for some to express

maybe that leads us back to a unified sense for language it expresses while it covers

like the world it shows itself while hiding

the groundless ground that allows things to appear while itself in not shown (h)

the thing in itself that shows while hidding

it's a metaphysical concept that has no bearing in reality has no bearing when it enters real space (it will be attacked and sliced down and lead nowhere again)

you yourself are hiding while in full view but insofar as not to be noticed aspects of you not to be attacked
not to be left open which is immediate call for attack


the other will attack an empty open space

the other wants to fill as much space as possible

you open up and close that's a continuous pattern that seems to be the continuous pattern for livings things for people

you try to calm down part of your brain that would otherwise be excited

you open up for attack you invite the attack momentarily but close of immediately that seems to be the mode of interaction

and it can be traced in any physical realizable postulate such as the wave up and down
or the binary 0 1

when you have two things you can show the one and hide the other

that's the basic idea

if you are one thing then you are either in complete hiding or complete show

when you show both things then you'r open for attack (am i attacking it? yes of course th attack is of the science the contemplation is of the philosophy)


if you hide both things then you are impenetrable
i don't know how much these conditions can last

"what if your defenses are low so that you can't really be in the open?"
"well my friend let me tell you a little story..."

or you think you work for posterity something in you tells you that these will count in a 1000 tears
haha
better wish for it otherwise your illusion is over

as we move away from the body we call that progress ("you call that progress?!" no i don't mean it that way but just as a neutral
how things change by progress we mean the evolution of the things we make the external of the body)

the ability to form higher thoughts came hand in hand with out ability to write to scratch things in stone

as we move away from the body we relinquish power to the machine that external that we make

that machine was the stick to reach for food the stone to scratch our thought

so there is a trend is towards the external the out of body

i see a really nice curve forming there

where people have their orientation tending are turned toward that's the future

people's orientation was eyes were turned towards america that was the future

now all eyes are not turned toward america or are turned with a little less intensity and a bit foginess

some distractions happen in china some annoyances in europe and some bizarre things happen in russia (and else where Venesuela etc)

5 modes of being

when you write an article you expect or write it so that others
support your argument (there you go big guy) i.e communiqay (which is the underlying cause of all other forms but here is more direct and explicit i.e banal)
congratulate you for your argument
budge your argument
enhance your argument
stay silent for your argument

as the situation is deadening on the street the online wars flare up

everybody is talking on their cellphones
there is not even eye-contact as before

we now communicate with videos likes and the lowly text response which is text

those words etched in stone
where really etched in stone
because they came from deep inside you
you had to etch them in stone
it was no work for you you just did it were justing doing it
if it was flutter of the everyday you wouldn't be compelled to write it
much less etched in stone

regrettable

i know this will be regrettable

but as we said when you dislocate your neck you start the blathering

these days my own thoughts dominate

i swim in my own thoughts

no other thoughts enter my brain

except for the few stable authors Engels Heidegger Sherwood Anderson

and those don't stay there for so long

A

how to get an A in my class

that's common in american professors

maybe i'm in the 1% minority but i find this hideous and to a puking effect

you want to be a doctor? "this is a recipe on how to live"? be a doctor

i don't know if this happened in the greek universities maybe to the more informed students

flub

most people want to see people with a little flub
because they see themselves
with a little flub
that makes them feel in

the world doesn't move around without flub

incoherent

if I write an incoherent piece today
noone will read it
or those who will attempt it will abandon it in due time

what is that
the mumble of the street dweller?
the chatter in the bar
that noone can hear but all nodding with their heads?
the Miss(z) Veronica Efferman?

if you write an incoherent piece
i will never read it
or if i attempt it i will abandon it in due time

so where does that leave us?
nowhere
in the wider sea or premanent peace

The Mathematics of Appropriation

(where the various symbols are variously defined and not as in the usual practice of mathematics that they have the same meaning if they symbolize the same thing)

and of course we can extent that to an affine transform

and that's along the lines of harman proposing not that we are gonna be creating some ideal since we can't know that

just something different

and that falls within the sphere of human creation not 'art'

May

when the state department or the state Apartment
or the dept of Energy and simulation
downgrades greece to level 0 and assigns Pakistan as the birthplace of democracy (ancient Pakistan that is)
then you will see the greeks scattering around running for cover
and they will be mobilized to the streets of course

that's a favourite sport

especially in May

Engels

Like all philosophers who enter the practical sphere he projects what he wants
he is good in his analysis of family and all history
but when he enters the economics and all that
a lot of hodge-podge unconvincing things happen...

perhaps

many people don't realize
and we all do  (not)
that once you said universe you should stop talking
because you said everything

therefore you must say everything you have to say before the magic word

does that constitute a magic ritual?
perhaps
to those who will take it that way

does this poem have its own architecture?
yes
definitely

Dawkins hypcrite!

[i don't wanna see that name again but it keeps propping up]

when people say evolution has no place for god
that's a laughable statement because it includes its own definition

there is no absolute

and because humans can not express that they fall into paradoxes
i can only create my own little absolute and uncompromising intransigent universe for my own defenses
but that's as far as the walls of my cube and paralilepiped

does that give us an inkling?

of source some will say this is the length of the language

but the language evolved out of the brain as a meta-function whose that based on?

and the paradox goes on

i can look at myself and i can look at myself looking at myself and i can look at myself at looking at myself at looking at myself
is that gonna lead to madness?
you sure bet it is


let the fish come out of the water and the animals be and forget about the gods
and gods delusions

rusionalist

the rationalists speak rationally about the rational

the allusionists speak in allusions about what cannot be said rationally

thus the allusionists seem to talk about a superset of what the rationalists talk about
they even accept the rationalist approach (proof etc) in the part that is rationalist

then why can't the rationalists make the leap?

of course there is the issue of the ego

but the ego has already been broken  from the allusionist side

the only answer is that they do accept it but do not publicly admit it


don't we all have something  we won't admit publicly?

Like i would say that i went to the prostitutes

"i went to the prostitutes you guys!"

"man you need help"

cog

"you do an empirical study and you get an empirical result"

isn't that bizarre?

i guess that cognitive thinker won't take his pills tonight

because the experiments were done on mice and only a limited number of people

of course it could be a provocative title
it won't hook me
to see at the very last line that his opinion is exactly the opposite

those cognitive scientists have some kind of preciousness for their brain

criticise - eulogize

όταν είσαι απέξω criticize

όταν είσαι από μέσα eulogize

analysis

the analysis of noticing-not noticing something is psychological in its basis: say you are in a bus if you are in a certain mood mode you will not notice anybody but if something disrupts and scratches through your attention you will notice : a  that guy is with the beard that lady is with the bags in her hands

the same with relationships

when you are in love enamoured with somebody you don't notice (or if you have that brain you will but pass off) the little imperfections when the relationship breaks down you notice them ( and they become big)

the same with a tv presenter (or an actor)
when they are in tune with themselves you are all focused upon it  on them

when they lose that in-tuneness lose their concentration the focus falls on the background on their clothing on the speckles on their face
(and the production manager or edit-manager or what's his name the person who switches with camera is to be viewed
is quick to notice
or  sometimes they don't or they won't change the camera
and the situation becomes awkward you will be forced to tun your attention somewhere else change the channel talk to the person next of you or something

when you like a given singer you are not bothered by the little imperfections in their voice or the false notes they produce

[
what's the thing  that breaks in the other person that makes the relationship breakdown?

in an equipment that is visible easily

a hair dryer breaks down because a pin somewhere broke

some people  call that then a piece of garbage or a "piece of crap" some will call it a-non-working-hair-dyer

of course if you don't get a scrap of how things work you will not know you will simply declare the thing doesn't work

now there must be pin in a person that breaks down for the whole relationship to them to break down

it's the un-in-tuness as  a general principle but can we locate and make visible the pin?

if you are in a bus the whole world may broken down around you and you could still be immune to it
a slight hair may move and your attention is disrupted

now we get into psychology territory what you expect to hear /see and what you expect to avoid

humans are a lot more complicated "machines" and we don't know whether they are complete in and of themselves so it's harder to locate the pin

it may be even a simple nerve cell that dislocates or put into misuse temporarily for flip second

well then we can locate the pin to a fine grain or as fine grain as we can

is that our whole purpose?

is that still a hair dryer?

different people will answer differently

in its absolute sense it's not because it's not a complete working hairdryer
part of it is missing that pin has broken into two or has been misplaced been gotten of the hook

it has become a mere thing according to heidegger's approach which is not far from commonsense

"give me that thing" or "throw that thing to the garbage"

thus from equipment has been demoted to thing

(the greek poet Solomos wrote in 19th century (loose translation):
poor dark rifle
I have you in my hand
you've become a burden to me
and the opponent knows it
[έρμο ντουφέκι σκοτεινό
που σ' έχω δω στο χέρι
όπου συ μού 'γινες βαρύ
κι ο αγαρηνός το ξέρει]
(anything that we can't use (for the purpose it was created for) when needed (broken relationship?) becomes a burden))

we are talking of a change in nature of thing  equipment to thing

can you restore it? yes

to its initial working or to a different working
that's not because it by itself changed itself

but because you intervened and changed its structure and possibly its function/working

thus a man-made object cannot change (by itself) can only be changed, by its master

I don't know what is hidden in a hammer
maybe the umbilical cord that connects it to the great-beyond
the great-darkness that we came from


then we have the self-modifying machine ( i remember the self-modifying programs in LISP)

we supply them a logic and they can choose from a range of possibilities

did they invent their logic of their own?

the master supplied the logic (and if they do 'invent' logic, that is based on the seed already provided to them - so the question leads to the usual question "who started first")


sometimes the relationship wears down
as with equipment

and reveals the nothingness that exists under it
no relation is complete to an absoluteness

none that we can prove in our limited time

some relationships have some strong hooks (a couple of them) that keep them in place and intact
despite the turbulence and the disruptions

some are just kept there for reasons of nothing else to do

like the hairdryer that you keep lying there because you can't feel to throw it away

in some cases this develops into a facile relationship (some may call it fetish-ization but it may go beyond that)

but in any case it's a non-working  thing
your relationship to it may still work (exist) at some  facile level
]

of course when the presenter is head on there is no choice but to show her
and the presenter is less likely to be disrupted as there are no others in the discussion
but it can happen the flow of text doesn't fit them well or the card guy makes the eyes on them

the attention can be disrupted at any moment so out intuneness with our selves is constantly threatened to be broken

then we have to switch to a different mode / mood

if we are successful at doing that (it happens automatically with most people)

otherwise we will be picked on by the others "is everything ok???"

jazz-rock

jazz fusion or jazz rock has that electric guitar which messes things around
jazz rock is messed up jazz
perhaps it allows lower parts of the brain to work up

it doesn't have that sheen of winds which may become stilted at times and non accepted

and you have that cheesey keyboards

or angular ones

chick corea is too angular as his face  proclaims
although we accept that he has his own unique style and he puts it forth

as you slide more towards the rock you get more of the potato-heads

like Holdsworth

his sound is ok and his picking

but his technique? what is that practicing exercises for the young guitarist?

essentially we are talking about virtuosos and nothing more

a + b = x

- that's what the mathematicians mean when they say return to first principles
- Ah that's what they mean?!
  But what is a and what is b?
- ah that's what we have to figure out

 he stopped short 

- he stopped short of describing
- describing what?
- that's what he didn't say
- hmm it seems he described the whole thing then

painting

sometimes I'm thinking we should do away  get rid of all the labels that are one level above the ground

what is this? this is painting (poussin)

what is this? painting and sculpture (rauschenberg)

art is snicky business

painting? it's paint liquid

nobody doesn't know what liquid means

because if you are one level above the ground you still see the ground the ground is still in view
if you go more the view is lost

of course you'll say you can bend your neck and tilt and twist and turn yourself and still see the ground (from that 7th floor)

that's tricky business
that's magic tricks
you earn yourself a place in eternity
but you don't earn eternity
you are einstein who reinvents the square law

[did he tell us that the universe is governed by a third power law?
cube vs square
3 dimensional space 2 dimensional equation power-1

well he invented a lot of other things...
that's what he is known for isn't he that's what his popularity is based on
you need a con-carde a symbol
a good name-tag and a smiling personality and off you go

that's what popularity means

as for essence..we will have to rely on others]

you are riehmann who bends the space

that's why women/females (appear) to have a 2-level structure a big mama in the center and the surrounding workresses

while the ego is high flying

(that's a high flying hypothesis)

or you could see that as a center and its circle
or you would be playing with words


or may be concentric circles

isn't that the same as hierarchy levels?


there may be some experimental evidence for that somewhere

of course women are not the same as men and the functioning would be different

the extreme feminism would have it that all be equal externally
but how can it be equal externally and unequal internally that's a contradiction and absurdity

some of the extreme feminism is for laughs (I did laugh out spontaneously once on a claim by a feminist)

i have an inkling that that's what we mean by circles of influence

the queen (of England that is) does not have the same aquaintance with all and each layer of aquaintance has a different influence on her

that's not an all-women but it's what we mean here

how would the queen delegate jobs to her circles (and what jobs)

it's not a realistic case since it runs on vapour but it has a realistic simile and has a remnant of old structure
that was real at one point

some will say this runs on already male structure and thus you can't make anything out of it
accepted we can only make...inklings

for the real thing we will have to go to some matriarchal society of the past / or present

it seems to me concentric circles lie on the plane and the pyramid runs the height (it's a phalic resemblance but it's not our concern)

perhaps the different circles don't report to the immediate succeeding circle but directly to the centre or maybe they do

whether concentric circles or pyramid it's the same layered delegating of tasks (I don't think the myth that everybody is doing the same task in the circle except the queen who oversees stands the chance of reasoning

in simple societies yes
the same could be said about males all the hunters and the chief
as things became more complex so the structure of the group had to be more complex - whether in men or women

so I'm busting the myth of multilayerism as being avert to females
that's not true females can have the same layers of ordering and commandeering and delegation of power

whether it's vertical or horizontal

i'm almost sure people will come back and develop them again

the fake dog

we are not gonna chase the fake dog
or the dog
the dog doesn't need chasing

the Big Dog is there
immovable

2010

in 2080 or 30
the accepted modes of common expression will say

in 2010 everybody had a blog

and they shouted away

what of it?

the trash bin

i don't believe in magic tricks
the world out there is as phantom as we are
lest we put ourselves in a high pedestal
we reserve for ourselves a special place
that's nonsense

and all the philosophical theories that are based on that are smashed into the head
like the vase with a hammer

those who still believe in that have the tendency to believe in sci fiction
are turned on by it or turn to it

i have a special place for science fiction

the trash bin

supreme

the supreme court uses a technicality to support its argument

the supreme leader uses a technical detail to support his ego

isn't that the nature of things?

the nature of things is not clockwork

And The Supreme Nonsense follows

Πάνου - Λύδια - Στανίση

η Πόλυ Πάνου μπορεί να σε ρίξει κάτω
η Λύδια μπορεί να σε ανυψώσει (στα επουράνια)
η Στανίση μπορεί να σου στρίψει το λαιμό (αν σε βρει στην κατάλληλη στιγμή)

προφανώς οι περισσότεροι προτιμούν την ανύψωση

αν και οι άλλες τρεις καταστάσεις είναι γόνιμες και υπαρκτές

The Powers of 2 and Why They Are Divisible by 2

[of course that's the provocative title which tries to obscure the answer that it gives
it's not a one thing it has two parts and the second tries to obscure the first
so a subdivision into two is necessary to discover the truth

subdivision into two ad infinitum?

of course the other way is to meld two into one
and they better be real not fony ones

ideally complimentary

here we have the evil intent to dissimulate by combining a straight statement with an evil dissimulatory one i guess that what the church calls the devil

you try to glue together two broken pieces of the same original one

not combine two pretentiously constructed elements

good vs evil

god and devil

or at least one is pretentiously constructed

and the melding of the two leads NOWHERE]

i wonder if that's what the salesmen mean when they say this beat up old car is brand new


ah the power of dissimulation

to make it appear

the appearance is the appearance

everybody gets the same perception / appearance (we will assume the retina is the same for all for now)

but how and where it is processed in the brain changes
]

i was thinking how to find a number that gives the longest possible division into 2 without being of course a power of two

i'm sure there is a theory somewhere developed or about to be developed or

we don't want the high brainy math
we want to keep it to the ground. you get me?


you got to start with an even number
because if you start with an odd you lost right off the bat

all powers of 2 have the pattern 2 4 8 6 2 4 8 6

in their rightmost digits

but then what?

what comes next to their left viccinity?

has it to be an even or an odd?

2 divided by 2 gives 1 so that loses right there if it also has an even to the left (which will be divided even to some number and leave no repercussions left for its rightmost friend)

so then you need an odd left to 2

such as 12 32 52 92: all divide to an even number so we still have hope for further subdivisions

what of the 4 he needs an even to its left otherwise he will fall into the odd hole when divided by two:

e.g. 14 -> 7

while 24 -> 12

and so on

and it doesn't matter what next the subdivision is guaranteed

112 -> 56

212 -> 106

now if you want two further subdivisions we got to choose a partner

an odd gives better subdivisions 112 56 28 14 7
212 106 53

and what if you chose 3 in the previous round to pair your 2

32

132 66 33
232 116 58 29

so that obviously has to do a lot

i'll stop right there since my brain is burning

and i'll go to a secluded place where there is no turning back
unless somebody hits me with a hammer in the head

and 2112 gives you a lot more repetitions subdivisions than 1112

obviously that has to do with the peculiarities of the numbering system

if you got a system with 3 digits 1 2 3 (ok and the 0)
2 would be 2 3 3
but then 4 is
10

oh jee that throws off my whole sceptics
but for the number 10 numbering system you get what you get


the other approach would be to ask how near to a perfect power of 2 it would have to be or how far

112 is closer to 128 than 212 (and 212 is closer to 256 then)
but 114 is closer and 114 -> 57 and that's it you fall into a hole

where in the landscape of numbers (whole numbers that is) would they be located?

it appears there are some "sweet" spots

let's try and graph these

and here for some higher intensity

(these are not normalized; i don't care for that)


we see the sweet spots are periodically populated  (the black is the abyss of the odd numbers)

see the dump see the vector of occurrences

c [1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 5, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 6, 1,
2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 5, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 7, 1, 2, 1,
3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 5, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 6, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2,
1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 5, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 8, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1,
2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 5, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 6, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3,
1, 2, 1, 5, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 7, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1,
5, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 6, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 5, 1, 2,
1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 9, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 5, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1,
2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 6, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 5, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4,
1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 7, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 5, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3,
1, 2, 1, 6, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 5, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 8,
1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 5, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 6, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1,
2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 5, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 7, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2,
1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 5, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 6, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1,
5, 1, 2, 1,  ]

you see the 9 in the middle for 512


that could be described by a recursive

it has the self similar of the fractalness

it abhorrs me to see these nice slithery pictures

we are creating a shiny surface here
and we leave the 2's and the 1's to live their lifes

το κακο

το κακο δεν αργει να συμβει
και δε συμβαινει σε  συγκεκριμενη χρονικη στιγμή
το κακο συμβαινει οποτε του αρεσει αυτο
και μπορει να συμβει σε οποιο χρονικο διαστημα όσο μικρο κι αν ειναι αυτο

September

with the first rain of September
everything becomes calm even for a moment

let yourself walk bare in the rain
for a few seconds
maybe you connect to the animal inside you

ears

"to all those with ears to hear"
sure that sounds a little defensivy to me
that's the humanly aspect
he was not a saint
do yo want to make him a saint?

do you see your self as a saint?
i'm sure you are as hideous in your private life as anyone of us

no matter the facade you stand

what are we gonna say about all the garbage of you
who voted for the iraq war?

prove that you have an intellect my friend

and stop hiding under your professorial desk

100

if you get 1 in 30 to vote down you will think
is this gonna stay the same or in 3000 votes i'll get 100 down?

 you have to have a representative sample

who is gonna guarantee me a  represntative sample?

if you do these and these you will decrease the probability of ..
and increase the probability of ...

it's a more or less then
a pat in the back "good job"

go to hell

a philosopher should be reserved for the very general subjects
being truth and maybe a few others such as limits to knowledge consciousness although that starts already going in the psychology direction

if you start epistemology of science and epistemology of brick layering

everyone is a philosopher and nobody will do philosophy as the old gnomic goes

"whats wrong with categorizing philosophers?

Nothing!

in fact the ego starts overtaking you without even realizing it

and you can't do anything about it

you can fight it
but you can't punch it out of existence

if you come to your senses you will think its embarrassing
what does "come to your senses" mean?

the culturally epilayer?
and what does "embarrassing" mean? something that doesn't conform to the others

some people have a 1000 followers and some 2
i wonder if jesus from nazareth had 12 or 15 followers
or were they the crowd (if that was a crowd) who amassed to hear him his followers?


to me clear and precise thinking is
we put down our penises and see whose is longer

does that constitute a man ?
surely it's part of your personality your being

but is that you?

it's a vantage point

and as with all vantage points it has its pros and cons

the pro is that you get exact and precise measurements
the con is you don't really get a sense or even a meaning what is

phase

it's a phase now we attack ourselves
now it's a phase we attack others

it's a phase now i attack myself
now it's a phase i attack others

and thus discredit myself
isn't that the teleology of all?
the obliteration of the self?

β

- βρωμάν τα χνώτα του
- γιατί:
- από τη στατικότητα
  όταν αποφασίσει κάτι δεν το αλλάζει με τίποτα
  είναι σαν πεθαμένος που αρχίσει να σαπίζει
  και τα μυρμήγκια μαζεύονται τριγύρω του

ανόητα

όλα ωραία και καλά
όλοι λέμε τα ίδια ωραία λόγια

αυτοί έχουν την εξουσία και χαμογελάνε
εμείς χαμογελάμε ανόητα

air

Edward Burns wow that guy is full of air

when i watched it a few years back it didn't notice on me
now bang it hits me the face his brain works at a different level than his seeming acting

he has a big bunch of air in him while the other guys are compact
I don't know if it's the air of the conceit or the air of the director or something else

I don't know what's with all those directors who want to be actors as well

at least woody allen makes a complete orangutan of him self  (lest we forget he was a standup comic) and thus keeps entertaining

spare me a moment

the Big-bangers and I solely mean the physicists who believe in such a moronic theory
do they mean that as a hyperbatic moment?
then it's well-respected it's another name for it
let's build a temple for it

do they man that in real space?
then the question becomes what came before it?
"well then we have to consider..."
give me a crap spare me a monent

0

the world we live
is the initial moment where everything happened simultaneously and thus for time 0's
sequential unfolding

clarinet

LeMont Young's drones are the only ones that have provably (that is repeatably) caused me headaches

there are other musics that would drive me nuts if i hear them again (like Reich's repetitive madness)

Xenakis is ok he has his extreme points like when he squeeshes that tape or something

In fact Luc Ferrari's direct incorporation of cicada sounds, LeMont Young's drones and Xenakis abrupt music (based on the grenade fragment he suffered in his ear) have something in common as they are based in nature and seem to point to a basic drone tone that exists and may be primordial

the same in electric guitar saxophone and electric clarinet (as is employed in Greece) as a modern substitute for that primordial drone

smanchy

enough of the fancy smanchy philosophy professors of America
who offer nothing more that chicky reviews and smart-ass advice
"I have a thought experiment to make"  ha ha

do it!

what does it mean

what does it mean to put out a disk
why don't you come and play us our songs?

why don't you send us in your disk
we don't wanna see you again

you see where this is going ...


what does it mean to drive?

I see a lot of training, for something - that goes forward

I see a lot of people avoiding boredom - that goes backward

I'm not satisfied with the answer

americans

i knew the americans are based on goth and are steeped into middle ages
the core of them were a bunch of criminals and low lifes

but i wanted to be light on it to see how it plays out

well it will not go any darker that it is

the rectangles

the being

- Did I tell you the being is a well polished sculpture with all the microstructure and the inner empty?
- Oh yeah? what of it?
- Chicks love it!

phenomenology of equations

                                         The above is the equation of the optical flow

we see the + has a prominent pose and the - (ok we need the distance)
the divide seems extravagant extraneous
I am also squeamish about the multiply

I'm proposing to consider all equations in this appeal of + (adding something) and - (difference/distance)

(In fact I would have preferred it like this

what about this?

)

extraneous

every extraneous thought brings us closer to reality
the mind brain duality
a thousand little girls chewing gum
me scraping off

will i be able to hold those four lines in my brain?
that's a technical device

a thought must be recorded to maintain its existence
a thought doesn't have to be recorded
a thought once it emerges is recordable
a thought is never recordable

our deepest thoughts are never recordable
like cornflakes to your breakfast

and what have i done?


the self is never recordable

the self is so unique
it hurts

it hurts to remember all those

so sleep well my beauty

always and usually never

that's what I have to say because I have to end with something positive

which is not aways true

and usually never

audio object

an audio object is something that contains and only contains sound

thus instructions on how to construct an audio object do not fall under this category

the audio object may not be a continuous stream of purposeful sound one that is being created by human

thus it may contain holes of absolute silence or unpurposed sound such as environment

an audio object is not necessarily music as it is construed currently

an audio object may be absolute silence but that is only one that type of object

an audio object is not necessarily to be heard for the purpose of enjoyment it simply has to exist

an audio object has to be recorded so that it may sustain its existence

an audio object may age and thus may suffer deterioration and degradation
it has however to have such characteristics that will maintain its character

you are blessed

I've been following the radio speakers

for a while

mostly progressives  because the conservative ones are so deep in it that becomes outrageous

previously I listed to Rush Limbaugh for some time he was good when relaying his stories from boyhood
when they treat and tricked some  old guys in the neighborhood that was entertaining

but then it stopped


randi rhodes is thin
that is she's very thin on the substance
like  taking a tiny bit a dough and spread  it on the table it will start to show through  holes will break out

shes is of lower intellectual level

stephanie miller was amusing and entertaining until she made the 'lesbian' turn
then I stopped I can't be listening to a lesbian (with  the knowledge that I do)
it's turning off

and turned into "dame" mode which will show later in her age
now she has turned back to somewhat amusing role but that's not it then she relies mostly on support guys

none of the speakers are currently thick

they all repeat huge speaking points that engulf them
and repeat the same again and again

until they become cliched

and what can you expect from political commentators? political commenting
nothing more

and outrage

if it's a little bit of humor

you are blessed

"your ass is on the line"

"your ass is on the line"

picture that

that's a picture with very sexual implications

taken literally it's  a man or woman's ass (and the adjoining man or woman of course) seating on a line on a wire

of course "ass" is so commonly used in american and anglo- culture that it is nearly a substitute for  'self'

seen

most people want to be seen
(that's why god gave them their body)
and that relieves them of their tension
once they are seen in a good way

some people are so bangled in their minds
that they don't sense that
because their bodies are dead

tear off

let's get this out of the way
"the devil is in the details"
if I ever see this expression again i'll tear off the screen

the devil is in the details
and the god is in the whole picture
so go  find your devil
I'll go and find my god

said

J J Gibson is known for starting the optical flow or apparent motion algorithm that Computer Vision people took from

I have nothing to add here except that JJ Gibson looks like a militaristic(army) guy from the one picture I saw
it looks like some other aviation people I know
he has that look that face posturing

and people in the military don't believe in metaphysics that's for sure
so that's where his direct vision comes in what you see is what you get
nothing behind the mask a complete facade
a flat topology

freewill

we can choose to look in any direction we want
is that supported by lower brain activity?
not necessarily
and usually our lower brain corrects that behavior and we turn to the direction we meant to

so free will is certainly not in the brain that thinks free will

free will is a term that we created when our brains advanced to a level where we could see inspect our lower brain

so it's an amusement for the higher brain

otherwise there is no free will there is no -no free will

the brain follows its route

infinite regression

the best we can hope for is infinite regression

in fact I wish it infinite regression so much
that my head spins around

outlook

and then the greeks will come from behind
we gave them the lights of the civilization

I don't know where those 'lights' come from maybe it's the lights on the Parthenon that try to hide the destroyed part (it's not their fault of course but they try their utmost to present an outlook)

and that's what's left from old empires like this the outlook the facade

and one need not look too far and hard to realize that these greeks are little related to the ancient greeks
and cannot know what those ancient greeks were just that they found themselves in that place in that time

the west takes them as their point of departure it's ok and who was before them? and before them? its all a chain of evolvements

what is convenient for us we take it as a starting point

YouTube

the minimal video is that with one image
and is there a video with zero images?
yes that's the audio  track

of course YouTube won't accept audio tracks
you gotta have something to view
let's be real

real

my current understanding is that quantum is a convenience [and I'm sure i will be proven wrong]

it's one of those things that gets you off when you hit a snag
like negative numbers

two things being at the same spot at the same time?
 impossible it doesn't happen it doesn't happen in real life maybe in imaginary

what does it mean to have -2 friends

and what does it mean that if i double on those 2 friends I can get negative number of friends?

complex numbers they are not really complex more like composites one real and one imaginary

I only understood them as two dimensionals
and then the magic starts

the e and the exponentials and the relation to cosines

I'm sure if you set back you will see what that means

it's all repeated in different form

what does it mean? I don't know

it's engineering to get around some holes
and then move on

the fancy language of mathematics is just the jargon of the complex minded it's another way to hide things while they can be said in very plain terms but they don't bother nobody bothers

and if you go to the ghetto you won't understand a thing that is if u are a white guy

new

new every product is new
it gets us off that old
and something new is coming down the line
another form of cheap escapicism from the science magazines or simply escapicism

if i go back and condense all those new-s into another one
they will not count more than the moment the present moment

or you could be in that tropical paradise
you will if you work hard for a few days and then amass a huge amount of money
and go there

and then it will all be bland again

or maybe i'm naive

i do have some naive moments that point in that direction

or that's my wicked mind that presents that so i can raise my ranking
to where?
to the eyes of you readers

"is that another reality again?"
"stop twirling your hair miss
and chewing that gum"


and yet these are the thoughts that come to me
right now

emotives

if we are not going to be emotive
what the hell are we going to be??
and you are blocking my emotives!!

August

in the dog days of August
no thoughts enter into your brain
you just stay there
and think the abyss

girl

there was this girl
supersmart
in computer science
and attractive
she had the boyish outlook

she had some break outs on her face but nonetheless attractive very attractive (Erin I remember her name)

and she sensed that I was attracted to her

she was looking at me in a certain way

i could sense that

but nothing beyond that

that was her way of saying "nice of you to feel attracted to me"

and she sensed the dread i was in as she had a little smile

I would never think of coming on to her

that was never the thought

the thought and feeling was that of an attraction

I now realize I would never been able to keep up with her

I would never been able to keep up a relationship

she must work at Google Tech now I assume or somewhere

[I'm almost embarassed writing this but what the heck it's all in the open]

feel

well we have reached the first decade of the new millenia

and it feels fine

every moment feels the same to the people who live it

does that mean that the world is unchanging?

we can see around us the changes

but I repeat every moment feels the same to the people who live it

too

[and now for a hole into my brain]

i reach a creach state
a state where the two brains collide
the epidermis
and the underdermis
"I followed all the rules man
and it didn't lead me anywhere"
"you have to pat someone in the back"

[then you have to lay there like all the other dogs
is that what you mean
is that what you are trying to say but not saying it?]


i followed all the rules
I passed all courses with good or better grades
I struggled with some too

programming didn't come natural to me it wasn't in my instinct
now i understand it mostly at the logical imperatives level
if you do this you will get this
or if you do that a number of times ...

but if you throw me the Dos and the Loops and the For I's
I don't get anything

I got a very distant feeling for it
i understood it at the level of example
if you use this program to compute the prime numbers then to compute the numbers to 1000
it would be the same, or similar

thus i struggled

and all the kids i teach afterwards
I could only explain it at that symbolic level

I can't explain why FOR has three letter and not two

[unless I resort to my unpleasant and exquisitive internal language
umbiguous and uncompromising]

scheme 1

in the doggdays of August
no thoughts enter into your brain
you just stay there restless
immovable

WFMU

transfer that to online and you have a bunch of cursing guys cursing at each other
and some women friskying in between
even leading that opera

science

directors like cameron and all that seems to be replete with new ageism

people who conflate science with religion
and final aitiology

[it's another patriotism - it exalts the tribe the power of the tribe]

who believe that science will have the answers to everything one day, or that indeed it has the answers to everything already

in fact they are looking at some painted doors

each and everyone

one is what he/she presents
and that's just as well
for each and everyone's defense

and we are left to wonder

whether ellen degeneres is safely on the other side of the border or
she could work both ways and that was her big show semi-stunt move, which seems to be her propensity

no more stunts left now since she made the big one "it's the big one honey I'm coming to join you elizabeth"

Dennet

Dennet is a psycho-engineer

he's not a philosopher
he's a psycho-engineer who tries to raise his thoughts into philosophy level

all those faint-philosophers that cover the entire hemisphere of USA

now off we go...

what say you Mr Dennet?

my brain is in Texas and my heart in New York?

that already been told by so many artists

let's hear the music!

am i the  only person who doesn't like the beatles?
of course i'm not
statistical theory shows otherwise
that sweet bitter sentimentality
that harsh soft
of course now i can do the analysis

but previously i avoided by instinct

i'm sure mozart was a disagreeable or devious character

let's hear the music!

dislocated neck

when you dislocate your neck you start the blathering
because that's the only defense
and those who are hurling invectives
are already of the hook

when you start seeing the fragments of your life that
means you are broken
and that's maybe good
the trouble is the other people will get in on you
the environment
to fill in the cracks

0-50b

Τερλέγκας: η ερημιά
Ζαν Πωλ Σαρτρ: η παγωμένη αίσθηση της μοναξιάς

-

The fact that you want to talk about the elections
is that you want to talk

-

εγκλωβισμένος στην ανάγκη
σου μένουν μόνο λίγες αναλαμπές
σαν ρούχο βρεγμένο πάνω σου
και τους άλλους να στο θυμίζουν
και να σ' επαναφέρουν στην τάξη

-

I always thought cellphones are for frivolous people
unfortunately 98% of the people use cellphones

-

art: presenting us our essence, in a form that we cannot use
science: trying to discover our essence in a form that we can use

-

ένα μεσημέρι θα σε δω κι εσένα
ν' ανεβαίνεις
με το στενό πουκάμισο

-

ποίηση είναι περισσότερο ομιλία προς τον εαυτό μας

-

αφού έφτασα ως το θάνατο
γύρισα πίσω
στη ζωή
αφού σκότωσα κάποιον στα ονειρά μου
ήρθα και τον κομμάτιασα στα δικά του

-

νά 'σαι ευτυχισμένος που πήγες από πολύτιμη πέτρα

-

ότι θα διαβάσουν
δεν είναι αυτό που θα γράψεις

-

Σήμερα θα κάνουμε μάθημα για τις ανισότητες υψηλού βαθμού
αυτές που έχουν το γράμμα έψιλον [e] : e^-ix
σήμερα θα κάνουμε μάθημα υψηλού βαθμού
σαν τα λάχανα που φύονται αυτοφύονται
σαν το στυλό που καρφώνεται στο πάτωμα
σαν την κόρνα που ακούγεται από μακριά και σ' εκνευρίζει
σαν τη φωνή του αγωγιάτη
σαν τα σταφύλια στο τσαμπί
σαν το κέρινο ομοίωμα
σαν τα μάρμαρα  => [e]

Zoe

Zoe Dechanel when I heard her on the radio Terri Gross show (i.e Fresh Air)
I thought she is some kind of serious actor singer songwriter and all that
and has come up time and time again
it seems Terri finds something common in her

it turns out she's a pricky personality
and she is not even careful to hide it
in fact she is projecting that

so then we must accept that that's her truth
and move on

illusions

- some illusions are needed  to sustain us
- and the illusion of Life?
- is the biggest one of all

Derrida

Derrida says Heidegger was my torchlight
but then says I never read his work

that's lot of Bull

of course it's a political statement

John Fof

- Hi my name is John Fof
  Friends call me the Fofster
- Wat can I do for yu?
- Did you see Joe Fife tonite?
- Who's Joe Fife?
- He's around town
- Ohhh

apparent

it is apparent that artform reaches its saturation points with exercises such as conceptual writing and etc

[
(if i take someone else's poem and put it in my hands that constitutes a different art-work - what if a beggar
put a poem in his hands would that be called art? yes according to the proponents
but I say there is also intention of the mind mind-set projecting certain energy that "I want this to be called art"
which forces us to accept it in that direction (at least as long as the energy lasts)

there is myriad dispositions of a work of art a book is fallen into the ground would that constitute different work of art
than the book itself?
I think we are reaching absurd levels of notions that only entertain as thought and might as well go into some handbook
but not be called art at least to the current conceptions of art - something that I worked to physically produce

otherwise the 4 55 moments of silence of Cage can be considered as a nice dance gesture can be categorized as dance it's pretty simple

and those who put in their hands books of others can be categorized as dancers
or performers in other sense

that's perfect let them do that dance and let us see (it) the dance

but of course we only see the end result of the dance which is the bodies frozen (in time and space)

a visual art like if the dancers were to be frozen there for ever

that would constitute sculpture

or if they were frozen in film that would constitute a film re- representation of the dance of the activities which was called art in the
beginning


therefore the 'artist' have some concept and pass it on to others to perform it's performance art

and we see the end result of course the end result is nothing in itself but we have to take in the whole performance

and that to be seen in its entirety is difficult if not impossible in some cases

therefore we have a fragmentation of art

where something is conceived in the minds of some people in italy and they are executed in afganistan

where is the art in this whole body?

it's the whole body which we don't it have as a whole

thus the exasperation you can't own that whole body

you would have to own the artist its mind and the produced result

or do we get the energy of the artist on the art work?

thats always the case (a painting of picasso carries his energy)

but now it becomes more pertinent as the artist is explicitly part of the art object

thus because these artists can't produce actual artworks (they are physically incapable or not inclined to do so)
they embody themselves int the art object which becomes
object from work

i.e. concept +work

thus the concept comes to the fore and we have to celebrate them for their concepts

that's science and they would do well to devote themselves to science

]

where the artform reaches the highly intellectuals where there is no action of the body but only of the brain (someone will say this happens
in every epoch - and then?)

these can be categorized as conceptual activities but the term 'art' carries enough currency so that everyone will want to be included in that

of course the definition of art changes it was craft in the ancient world (e.g., the Parthenon)

where now craft is relegated to the lower echelons of folk and kitschy activities

everyone will agree that art is to produce something beautiful but what that beautiful means is different for different people
it can also mean anti-beautiful such as those feminist-based activities which are used to protest something

I say art is the expression of non-functionality and the genuiness of it will be determined by time

this includes the above named activities and it is unfortunate that it does

but I think the above named activities are a show-off

so then we will have to deal with practice and cut off some


I like the notion of Bill Benzon http://new-savanna.blogspot.gr/2012/07/bryant-watch-mcart.html that brings it back to the 'eye of the beholder' or bring it back to circle
'let me hang this in the wall and let people see it and decide if it is art if it has any effect on them positive negative

[I have to re-read heidegger's on the work of art but I think his dictum is that the work of art opens up truth]


this opens the question of categorization

different levels of people will have a reaction to different levels of 'art'

so it is a problem of time

and don't go be taking exit polls outside the museum
there will be ohhhh and aaaaahs of the people
then they go home and sit down on it
or years will pass
or centuries

of course other forms are easily detectable right off hand

I have to say I'm surprised by the conceit of these people

they are clever manufacturers

of course everything that is is
and everything that exist exists

technocrat

when you watched dick chenney in the 90s you would say this is a technocrat - of course he says what he has to say ("capability")
but he is a "correct" technocrat

[i never knew the bent of the neck is code especially in the busino-executive style for blocking the
activity from going to my brain so i can continue to lie without being disturbed]

noone would suspect what he hid in his side

mechanistic

many scientists believe in free will but work to cut down reality to small size pieces that it becomes mechanistic

dead

it appears some boys turned to homosexualism because they were so ugly or undesirable that
no girl looked at them much less go and consummate

and when no girl looks at you
you know you are pretty dead

happiest now

some day i wish I could speak so disconnected that nobody would understood

and that day is the happiest now

the well tuned mechanic

the well tuned mechanic will serve the regime
no matter what his feelings are

i have a box of tools to sell
come on and buy one

it's the selfish wrench
the cranky wrench

and they all have pretty anthropomorphized names
the johnny wrench
the bobby wrench
the bobbi pin
that's so you can connect them
you know

agglomeration

telemarketer

well you have all kinds of telemarketers

in the pristine word of science

all hours of the day

all hours of the internet

from people with prestigious jobs

that will try to sell their book

and maybe they even come with that flower print shirt
at your door
to sell it

narrow

you go into one field and you narrow it down and narrow it down and narrow it down
then you go into another field and narrow it down and narrow it down
and then you go into another field and narrow it down and narrow it down

and you become a polymath idiot

easy

it's easy to make names for everything ...if you wanna sell them

databases

ontology
what a fancy word it means talk about beings

very close to oncology

[it comes for ancient greek on the being onta the beings]

when a friend in databases said "we gonna be talking (decide (define about ontology"
i thought "man what do you need that kind of fancy language for you are in databases you put data in you take data out"

but I didn't tell him I though maybe we will need that term too, one day some day

why not say hierarchy of beings

maybe we are trying to hide some meaning here

like epistemology in plaint terms scientology

ooooh

now we are getting into something

toilet

i wish i could smash that toilet and we all be fine

let it be consigned to some museum of historical significance
a side show a show of freaks a yellow press a tabloid news paper

of course i would be fined and sued by the high esteemed purveyors
of nothingness

form

that is definite
since the form is to indicate the content any disagreeable form carries away
for purposes of personal survival

that's it at least at the biological physiological level

I don't know about the teleological

period

every period has its science and its approximation to the world

I say 3x3 is 10 and everyone is satisfied and works along with it
but then a clever little guy comes along and says ".. but no 3x3 is 9" a better approximation

and we look at those people who believed the earth was flat
but that was their approximation

and we laugh at them
ha ha
"how stupid they were"
as I'm sure we are the stupids of a later period

but don't let those scientists be gods in place of god

they will never find it and they know it
but they lavishly accept the laurels

passe

is it ok for me to describe that I watched an episode of bionic woman yesterday on internet (half of it until it became passe/predictable you will notice all the energy of the actor is in the beginning and heidegger agrees with me that the truth is backwards

the truth is in the beginning
truth as in the 'first moment of disclosure'
truth as the uncovering the "let it be seen as it shows itself"

or is it better that I use a clip of it?

of course the best is what resonates with me and Benjamin said some similar that the real/whole energy is with the original

.... I prefer to show the clip

baby Jesus

- 1% means one in a hundred people is rich, wealthy rich
- well that means one among us is wealthy rich
- oh baby jesus!!

right wing left wing ...

some people go to the left wing because they can't get along with right wing people

and that's true mostly in hollywood
where everything is of the "show"

disorder

americans have an aversion to puns otherwise why would the expression "no pun intended" be created
and attain so much gravity and spread through the mass cultures

why would they not say "no lies intended"?

to work a pun as a way of high brain intention and manufacture is a disease

but not the "unintended" lower brain manufacture

like so many other "diseases" that have been manufactured like being a fast-talking bastard
is that a "disease" or "character disorder"?

what about being a hypocrite

Anglo-American

now the Anglo-American strain of so-called philosophy
is of course not philosophy
it's the science that benefited from it
and all we got left is fluff
and smoke of cigarettes

pithy aphorisms

time for pithy aforisms
which means I don't have pithy aforisms

moving image theory

a picture has three ways to move: horizontally vertically and in-and-out of the page (all other movements are combinations of these so we only consider the pure ones)

the moving can be of the same image or of a different image

John

- John, tell us about dad.

- Well you know he's making himself comfortable over there. Don't worry about him.

- You know he forgot a lot of his stuff, discs, clothing...

- Oh, ok I'll bring it to him next time I visit.

- He didn't ask for it? I'm surprised.

- No he didn't. When did he leave anyway?

- Just a few days ago. Right after you left on your vacation. By the way, how was the trip? You didn't tell us who you went with...

- Oh, that's a secret. Trust me it's not a big deal.

- Come on. Tell us who's the lucky lady?

- That's not gonna come up any time soon. Don't beat it.

- Ok, ok. We are not gonna insist. Did you have a good time?

- Oh yea it was pretty good, Anyway where is dad's stuff?

- Oh we haven't packed it up yet.

- You haven't packed it up yet? Ok let's do it.

- Now?

- Now! Why? It's only 8 o'clock and I've got no taste for studying right now. At least today. I'm just racing, you know, right after coming from vacation to hear that dad is gone, then to go and visit him. You know, I'm still racing, let's just do something to burn that up.

- Ok I see, well then, let's just do it. Mary, are you gonna help us?

- Sure.

- Ok let's go to his room...

- These are his discs?...Let's see we have Charlie Parker, Al Di Meola, John Coltrane...

- Yea don't mess with them they are his precious stuff. Just put them in the box in here with his clothes. You are gonna go there any time soon?

- Yea next week.

- Are you taking me there with you Johnny?

- No, no, you will go with mom some other time.

- I'm not going there.

- But you have to, mom. Sooner or later you have to visit him. You know he's not coming back. At least in the foreseeable future.

- I know that. But I don't think he wants me there.

- How do you know that?

- Otherwise why did he have to leave?

- That's a different matter. I don't know that myself. But I don't think he would mind seeing you once in a while.

- Well, I don't know about that. What I know is that he should stay with his family and kids and not go around with these bitches.

- I think you are exaggerating mom. I don't think dad is going around with any of these...what you call them.

- Sorry I got overcarried.

- Anyway, he's got his own place and you should go see him some time. Maybe he will tell you why he left.

- I don't think that will be the case but I will. Do you see anything under his bed Mary?

- No mom. There's nothing in here.

- Ok let's go then. Put everything you have in your hands in here and let's close up the box, take it downstairs. Where did you go again?

- Fort Lauderdale.

- That sounds good.

- It's getting too crowded anyhow but it's still beautiful. Miami is over flowing you know. FtL is picking up the pieces. All the rich up and coming Mexicans, I mean Cubans, are moving to FtL. I always confuse Mexicans with Cubans.

- They are latin anyhow.

- Cubans have that african element in them although they boast of their European roots. But Mexicans are more earthly people, what do you think mom, they look more like they descend from the Mayas.

- I don't know Johnny you know I'm not in good terms with history.

- Yea I know me neither. But you can see the difference in their facial characteristics. I mean between the white, or let's say whitish, Cubans and the Mexicans. Anyhow! Even though they look different I always confuse them in my speech when referring to one or another.

- They are both latin I told you!

- Yea that must be the reason...So the rich Cubans are moving up to FtL and the new ones the newcomers are taking up the space in Miami.

- I see.

- So we've got any videos to watch tonight?

- No, tomorrow is a school day, last one of the week actually. Your sister and I got to wake up early. Even if we did I wouldn't recommend it. It's 9 o'clock already. But you can stay downstairs at the TV and watch if you like.

- Ok I'll do that Goodnight then.

- Did you have anything to eat?

- No. Have we got anything?

- Just look in the kitchen and you will find it.

- OK.

- Goodnight. Take this thing down with you.

- See you tomorrow. Goodnight.