in/out

the in/out question cannot be resolved in a positivist scientific way
but it can be fudged up

"probabilistically we are there"
"probabilistically we are there too"
"probabilistically we are all there"

so what's the difference?

NONE

I'm smelling something like that in the quantum world but i'm holding up for "further clarification"

economists

economists are like mathematicians
but they are not really interested in equations they don't grab their interest they want to be social

so they pretent to solve equations they pretend to apply some equational model while patting you on the back lower upper whatever
they want to pat to be one of the crowd

sure everybody does don't be mind about that

but we have to examine the strict requirements do they offer something real? relevant?

no

they just want to hang out

big Marx showed the way

you hang out hang out grow a long beard hang out
and project

what you project is what the people want

your projections are their demand

so the equations remain unsolved

what to do?

you patch up
from here from there
all around

the final product is as good as gold

reflection

here's my current hypothesis:
people who have no connection to real life want a reflection of it in shiny things such as animation start trek paraphernalia and such

is the american way producing that?

noone in greece is talking about star trek - may be a niche very remote but certainly not making its appearance anywhere

or is it the anglo world?

neo-realism

neo-realism? what kind of crap are you piling again on me?

cinema is fantasy

if you want realism go to documentary go shoot a village and come back with the loot

it's less of a fairy tale of hollywood

it's more of grandma's fable story "and that's how we kids grew up ...""

but the director is in charge is in poza

he won't let the details get in the way of his myth making